Reality TV in the Age of Credulity

October 23, 2010

 

kill your tvI recently got my foot smashed to hell while doing something stupid. Crippled and couchbound, I indulged the great American painkiller: Reality Television. That just made me more stupid.

We all know the Idiot Box is an insidious device. The TV snares your attention and lulls you into a passive stupor, polluting the subconscious with compulsive memes and corporate logos. It’s like getting blown by an android in a Wal-Mart stockroom. Yet there I was, swilling beers and letting Jersey Shore, American Idol, and truTV’s All Worked Up drown me under electromagnetic waves of human detritus.

Reverend Ron is a redneck repo man with a bleached flattop and cameras in his face. Ron cruises Lizard Lick, NC with Bobby the badass sidekick, reclaiming unpaid vehicles from ignorant white trash and whippin’ ass when necessary. That’s what All Worked Up is all about. Real people with detestable occupations, whippin’ unemployed ass. The rural South is hard, and folks will occasionally draw weapons when their Camero is at stake. Ron and Bobby get cussed at, spit on, manhandled, and shot at, but they always come out on top. Again and again and again. Then the Reverend offers some wordy gem, like “I was sweatin’ like a sinner on the front pew on Sunday” or “I’d rather drink 50 gallons of gasoline and piss on a forest fire than mess with you, Bobby.” You know, real people, like you and me.

The thing is, real people are never themselves with cameramen buzzing around like bottleflies on a fresh turd. More importantly, when bumpkins catch repo men loading their cars onto tow trucks—surrounded by flood lights and boom mikes—they don’t pull out their rifles and unload. And if they did, no cameraman would get in the shooter’s face for a close-up—at least, not twice.

Does that mean that All Worked Up is not entertaining? Of course not. It just means that it isn’t real. It’s like Chris Angel floating from an off-camera crane on Kevlar cables, or Benny Hinn healing hired plants in his congregation, or glowing testimonials on any Kevin Trudeau infomercial, or “Stone Cold” Steve Austin crushing skulls. Reality TV is about as genuine as North Korean fans at the World Cup. But you already knew that.

I’m not suggesting that the booze-soaked baked potatoes on Jersey Shore aren’t really idiotic. They are. But you can be sure that when they’re out on the town being tailed by film crews, they are only acting like idiots. It’s no secret that “reality” producers create drama with deceptive editing techniques and cast manipulation. Some shows even use a script with directed improv. No matter how hands-off the production is, you can bet that “reality” personalities are caricatures at best, hungry for attention and baited by producers. America loves them all the same.

Despite a slip with the networks, nearly a fifth of this season’s new programs are reality shows. While broadcast favorites like American Idol, Cops, and Survivor are still drawing millions of viewers, new reality programs keep springing up on cable like designer drugs in your local highschool. The genre may have lost its novelty, but its staying power is phenomenal.

In this age of self-induced credulity, it comes as no surprise that midterm elections hinge on the rants of double-talking pundits and 30 second character smears. Everyone knows that all politicians—even the Messiah—will say whatever it takes, that rock stars won’t solve world hunger, that the wars will never end. We are well aware that the pill’s side effect is lifelong addiction and there will be no cosmic season finale on 2012 to erase our mistakes. No one believes that Reality TV is real, but no one is turning off their set either.

With cameras on every street corner, it seems that American society is awash in the “reality” aesthetic. This alarming combination of surveillance and exhibitionism has become the norm. Social networks are a prime example. People put the dismal minutiae of their lives on display in this burgeoning alternate universe, where checking profiles and posting updates passes as friendship. 500 million mini-reality shows strung mouth-to-tail, an egocentric feeding frenzy of webcams, blogs, and Twitter accounts. Despite all odds, every member of this “community” hopes somebody out there cares. It should be a great comfort that no matter how much your friends ignore your evolving profile, marketing analysts and government agencies really do care, and they are watching intently. You are the star on Facebook, and who knows, maybe Paris Hilton will add you to her Friends.

How ironic that despite this outpouring of “real” stories, the art of storytelling rapidly dissolves as inexorably as a tooth in Coca-Cola. In the olden days—say, fifteen years ago—to tell a story meant capturing the essence of events and bringing them to a significant point. A good storyteller is admired for craft and clever twists. His or her task is to condense the complexities of real life into comprehensible myth. Remember? Literary expression was never perfect, but it wasn’t “just gott 2 tha house… bout to eat pb&j w bff. i h8 my life ; )))” either. Even at the height of Dallas (which should have shot J.R. the first episode), critically acclaimed drama did not consist of cameramen hovering over dumb sluts slapping each other’s snot-smeared faces.

American talent has not been drowned in this pedestrian tsunami, but I would say that true genius is paddling for its life at this point. Mediocrity has always existed, but when was it ever held in such high regard?

Sometimes I find this encouraging. After all, in the Land of Paraplegics, the one-legged man kicks everyone’s teeth in! But as my metatarsus knits back together and Western civilization’s adoration progresses from Astarte to Aphrodite to Snooki, I suspect that we’ve lost something along the way.

aphrodite

snookiYears ago, I walked through a park in Nimes, France, built in the days of ancient Rome. Gorgeous marble statues of Roman deities stood silently near the mouth of Namuz’s spring. I approached one of them, a lovely young woman of perfect proportions. Her naked flesh of white marble stirred me deeply. I remember the inscription, “Vers D’amour.” When I got closer, I noticed that some barbaric fuck had recently carved his own witty inscription into her lovely white posterior. Two thousand years of perfection, and then this cretin came along—the star of his own little show.

I suppose we’ve come a long way since Juvenal’s Rome. Our bread is pre-sliced and our circuses have moving lights. I mean, we don’t throw our Christians to the lions, right? On the other hand, at least the Christians were real in those days. And so were the lions.

[Also posted on Disinformation]

© 2010 Joseph Allen

 


Cybershark Feeding Frenzy

October 21, 2010

Published by Taki’s Magazine:

The perverse coupling of surveillance and exhibitionism forms a cornerstone of American technocracy. Most Americans, be they liberals or libertarians, are unnerved by government agents, corporate data-miners, or high-tech Peeping Toms probing their personal details. And yet invasive, weirdly intimate technologies multiply like digital cockroaches, all but devouring the expectation of privacy taken for granted only a generation ago. Progress is simply too en vogue to resist.

Reality television brings a glamorous air to perpetual surveillance. The genre has enjoyed immense popularity over the last decade—comprising nearly a fifth of new broadcast programs this season—with cameramen poking into American life’s every facet. From moneyed luxury’s heights to the working-class struggle’s dregs, everyone’s in line for their 15 minutes of fame.

Consequently, the art of living on film is continually refined. But the recent success of TLC’s Sister Wives sounds an ominous warning as to who may be watching behind the camera’s prying eye. Immediately after the show’s premiere—which revealed a renegade Mormon polygamist’s fecund lifestyle—Utah authorities launched an investigation on Kody Brown and his four wives, with bigamy charges pending.

The risk of one’s private life going public is all-too-familiar to celebrities and politicians, but these days everyone gets their chance to shine in the searchlight. Social networks, YouTube, Twitter, and the blogosphere have captured and amplified a narcissistic culture of exhibition. Driven by Mark Zuckerberg’s philosophy that “a world that’s more open and connected is a better world,” Facebook now claims over 500 million users—making it the world’s third most-populous “nation.” In less than two decades, it became normal to display one’s personal details online—from romantic relationships and family photos to political affiliation and business activities. Even if you choose not to have your personality digitized, chances are that someone you know will do it for you. AVG Security estimates that 92% of American babies have their picture on the Internet. Anonymity is practically dead, with a Facebook memorial in the online graveyard.

Aside from being a smorgasbord for typical stalkers—and be honest, who hasn’t gone profile-trolling?—social networking also has market analysts and government agents licking their chops. It has become a common practice for law-enforcement agencies—from the Boston PD to the Department of Homeland Security—to “friend” suspect individuals and monitor their posts. If investigators want to dig deeper, our electronic communications’ trusted stewards—AT&T, Google, Yahoo!, Verizon, etc.—regularly provide access to private communications under the Patriot Act. On the corporate end, The Wall Street Journal recently examined the unethical activities of Web-based “listening services” that scrape forums for biographical information—including sensitive medical issues such as HIV, depression, and impotence—to craft more effective marketing techniques apparently geared toward human frailties. Illicit scraping aside, the practice of selling a client’s “anonymized” personal information is now routine. Inquiring minds want to know, and they know whom to ask.

And who could blame them? For entities that depend on psychological profiling to investigate and manipulate an otherwise inscrutable population—authority figures whose sympathies rarely lie with nonconformity or dissent—the human soul’s digitization is a dream come true. Whether we pour our deepest selves into public profiles or private emails, our personal lives have become fodder for cybersharks.

Wired magazine covers a vast array of disturbing digital-surveillance projects…

Read the rest at takimag.com.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.